A World Without Work
Daniel Susskind · 2020
Oxford economist Daniel Susskind argues that this time the machines really are different: as AI encroaches on more tasks, the danger isn't sudden mass unemployment but a gradual shortage of well-paid work, and a crisis of income, power, and meaning.
The clearest case yet that automation's real threat isn't mass idleness overnight but a slow drought of well-paid work, and a sober plan for what to do about it.
Two of the ideas you’ll keep
The Clif summary of A World Without Work pulls out 7 insights. Here are the first two.
- Every wave of technology sets off two opposing forces: a **substituting force** that lets machines take work from humans, and a **complementing force** that raises the value of the tasks left to people. For 200 years the complementing force won. Susskind's claim is that it is now weakening.
- The **ALM hypothesis** (routine tasks are automatable, non-routine ones are safe) has been overturned by **task encroachment**, machines steadily colonizing tasks once thought to require distinctly human judgment, from driving to diagnosing disease.
The other 5 — and the full 11-minute summary — are in the app.
What’s inside: 9 chapters
The whole summary runs about 11 minutes, read or listened to.
- An Age-Old Fear, and Why This Time May Be Different
- Two Forces: Substituting and Complementing
- Task Encroachment and the Fall of the ALM Hypothesis
- The Pragmatist Revolution and the AI Fallacy
- Not Zero Work, but Not Enough Work
- The New Inequality: From Labour to Capital
- The Big State and Conditional Basic Income
- The Power of Big Tech
- The Problem of Meaning and Leisure
Finish A World Without Work tonight.
Read or listen to the full summary in about 11 minutes, then keep the ideas with a minute of review a day. Start with the 2-minute quiz — no card required.